Previous Indian T-20 captain Hardik Pandya proceeded to draw feedback for his later execution. There has been a tremendous dialog on his put in Group India’s T-20 squad, however BCCI has granted Hardik Pandya the bad habit captaincy of Group India for the up and coming T-20 World Cup.
After his arrangement as the bad habit captain of the side, previous Indian all-rounder Irfan Pathan propelled a new assault on BCCI, giving the illustration of Shreyas Iyer and Ishan Kishan, who were dropped from the squad until they performed well in first-class cricket. Be that as it may, no such activity has been taken against Hardik Pandaya.
In his later interaction with Star Sports, Irfan Pathan said, “Already, Hardik Pandya held the captaincy, but Rohit Sharma took over for T20 matches. Post-T20 World Container, there was a modern arrangement: they pointed for a more youthful group with Pandya and Surya as potential captains. However, questions emerge with respect to Pandya’s execution consistency and commitment to Indian cricket.
Irfan Pathan advance included, “Customary interest in residential cricket is basic for serving Indian cricket all through the year. Wounds are inescapable, but legitimate arranging including reliable coordinate play, counting residential cricket, is crucial for a player’s return.
But at that point there’s this one player who returns from damage without satisfying the same prerequisites. That shouldn’t happen since it sends the off-base message to the rest of the group. When they see one player getting extraordinary treatment, it disturbs the group environment. Cricket isn’t like tennis; it’s a group where uniformity is crucial. Each player ought to be treated decently and equally.
Regardless of whether you’re a newcomer or a prepared player like Rohit Sharma or Virat Kohli, cricket is a group done to begin with and first. I’ve seen things in the past, especially among the T20 World Container final year, that went against the standards of Indian cricket—instances where certain players were given undue advantage, which is unacceptable.”
Irfan Pathan moreover raised questions around BCCI’s choice to grant Hardik Pandya the bad habit captaincy of the Indian group, as agreeing to him, Jasprit Bumrah was a better-deserving candidate for that part.
